Why didn’t education comply with the ruling of the Court of Justice regarding the “cancellation of the age requirement of 22 years” for Farhangian University?! – rahnam

According to the social reporter of rahnam News Agency, Dezhan “Age limit for entering Farhangian University” It has always been raised as one of the issues objected to by the entrance exam candidates, and considering the benefits of this university, such as exemption from military service for boys, counting student years as years of service, employment from the moment they enter the university, and paying salaries to student teachers, supporters Studying in this university is a lot.

The Supreme Council of Education has also set a maximum age of 22 years to enter Farhangian University.

However, the Court of Administrative Justice based on the complaint of one of the candidates to enter Farhangian University regarding the age limit set for entering this university, He voted to cancel the age requirement.

While the decision of the General Board of the Court of Administrative Justice is binding for the institutions, Education and Education has again announced the age requirement of 22 years in this year’s entrance exam booklet for the admission of teacher students through the special entrance exam of Farhangian University!

The application of Article 91 has not been approved

In this connection, Mansour Ardestani; The Director General of Legal Affairs of the Ministry of Education, regarding the setting of the age requirement of 22 years in the 1403 entrance examination booklet, despite the ruling of the Court of Administrative Justice, said: The answer to this issue should be the Vice President of Planning and Resource Development of the Ministry of Education, because they set the terms of the admission criteria for students by Farhangian University and for The entry in the examination booklet was submitted to the assessment organization.

He added: We have not yet received any official confirmation of the application of education for the application of Article 91. On the other hand, the resolution of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution, which was approved in May of this year and specifies the general and specific conditions for studying at Farhangian University, has not yet been approved. It has not been notified and we do not know whether it is on the way to be notified or not.

Article 91 of the Law of the Court of Administrative Justice states: “If the head of the judiciary or the head of the court or 20 members of the general board find any of the votes of the general board or the definitive votes of the specialized boards to be wrong or contrary to the law, the head of the court will refer the matter to re-refers the hearing to the General Board; If the general board finds the issued vote to be wrong or contrary to the law, it will take action to violate it and issue the correct vote.

Ardestani noted: Maybe other colleagues in education know that these policies have been approved, but we have not yet seen the official confirmation. However, if the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution has not been notified, the Ministry of Education was required to approve the decision of the General Board. to execute the administrative justice court.

He noted: The Court of Administrative Justice considered the principle of employment in its decision, while in Farhangian University, we accept scholarship students. Also, if a person aged 35 or 40 wants to enter Farhangian University, he must study for 4 years and after It enters the classrooms, imagine a person wants to be a teacher at the age of 40 or 44, can he be the teacher we expect or does he even bother to work with students?

Previously, Ali Farhadi; The Vice President of Planning and Resource Development of the Ministry of Education announced that the decision of the Court of Administrative Justice regarding the age limit for entering Farhangian University was overturned and said: In this decision, it was said that people up to 40 years old can apply to Farhangian University, while in Farhangian University there is a discussion Employment is not an issue, but a scholarship. Currently, the upper age limit for entering Farhangian University is 24 years, unless the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution makes a different decision.

Following the protest of education and the implementation of the decision of the Court of Administrative Justice, the President of the Court wrote in a correspondence with the First Vice President: The decision of the General Board of the Court of Administrative Justice is based on the fact that the decisions and actions of the executive bodies in determining the minimum or maximum age are lower or higher. From what is stipulated in Article 42 of the aforementioned law (even in the age range of 20 and 40 years) and age classification based on educational qualifications, it is considered against the law.

However, unfortunately, in the recruitment tests, the above-mentioned law and opinions are not taken into account and again the age conditions contrary to Article 42 of the Law on State Management Services are repeated in these booklets, and this leads to the exclusion of many people from participating in the tests and public dissatisfaction. There has also been an increase in the number of cases in the court.

Therefore, in order to correct this illegal procedure in employment test booklets and improve the public confidence in the governing bodies, the provisions of the aforementioned votes should be communicated to the executive bodies and especially the institutions responsible for holding these tests, including the administrative and employment organization of the country, in order to prevent The violation of people’s rights and the wastage of public resources and treasury should be prevented from frequent entry of these cases to the Court of Administrative Justice.

It should be noted that in case of a resolution contrary to the provisions of the decision of the General Board and its annulment in the General Board of the Court of Administrative Justice, according to Article 92 of the Law of the Court, the officials and members who have taken the initiative to enact such a regulation against the decision of the Court shall be responsible for compensating the damage caused to are individuals and are recognized as suspects and subject to Article (112) of this law.

end of message/

Leave a Comment