Education and Farhangian University object to the implementation of the decision of the Court of Administrative Justice – rahnam

According to the social reporter of rahnam news agency, a group of people admitted to the national entrance exam for Farhangian University have faced the problem of age limit, and the education department is preventing them from registering because the age of this group of admitted people has reached 24 years.

After banning the registration of Farhangian University, a complaint was filed in the Court of Administrative Justice and the matter was reviewed in the General Board of the Court. Finally, the general board issued its decision on July 20 of this year and announced: “The age requirement for the official probationary employment of the Ministry of Education through Farhangian University in the national exam of 1401 (the subject of paragraph 4 of exclusive conditions) is against the law and outside the limits is authorized and documented in paragraph 1 of Article 12 and Article 88 of the Law of the Administrative Court of Justice approved in 2012. This decision is based on Article 93 of the Law of the Administrative Court of Justice (amendment approved on 10/2/1402) valid in the proceedings and decisions of judicial and administrative authorities And it is the criterion of action.”

However, despite the issuance of this decision, Education and Culture and Farhangian University still prevented the registration of this group of accepted students and requested to apply Article 91 of the Law of the Administrative Court of Justice to review and cancel the decision issued.

Follow-ups by rahnam’s reporter indicate that this request was rejected by the Administrative Court of Justice and the decision of the General Board still stands.

Education and the Farhangian University are committing lawlessness and disobeying the decision of the Court of Administrative Justice that Hojjatul Islam Hekmat Ali Mozafari; The head of the Court of Administrative Justice recently and during correspondence with the Council of Ministers, Tehran Municipality and the General Staff of the Armed Forces, emphasized: “The failure to comply with the deadline stipulated in Note 2, Clause 4 of Article 63, or the failure to comply with the provisions of the Court’s decision in the next decision by the authority of the complaining party The subject of this article, if it is not substantiated with a justified excuse or legal reasons, it will cause the imposition of the penalty according to Article “112” of this law against the effective members in opposition to the court’s ruling.

Article 112 of the Law on Organizations and Procedures of the Court of Administrative Justice states: “If the defendant complains about the execution of the decision, he will be sentenced to temporary dismissal from public service for up to five years and compensation for the damage caused by the decision of the issuing branch.”

end of message/

Leave a Comment